|
Home
Errors, ethics issue surface in Aetna Tricare
contract
By Tom Philpott
Aetna Government Health Plans of Hartford, Conn., appears to have
gained an unfair advantage in competing for TRICARE’s North Region
support contract, valued at $16.7 billion, by hiring a former chief of
staff at TRICARE headquarters to help the company draft its winning
proposal.
The Government Accountability Office, auditing arm of Congress, said
the chief of staff had access to proprietary information on
Aetna’s rival, Health Net Federal Services of Rancho Cordova,
Calif., before leaving government, and also while working for Aetna
because he continued to have access to sensitive documents through his
old TRICARE e-mail account.
In a 36-page decision, GAO upheld Health Net’s protest of the
contract award to Aetna, advising the TRICARE Management Activity (TMA)
in Falls Church, Va., to conduct a new review of bids and make a new
decision, taking into account what their auditors found.
Just last month, GAO also sustained Humana Military Healthcare
Services’ protest of TRICARE’s $21 billion support contract
award for its South Region to UnitedHealth Military & Veterans
Services of Minnetonka, Minn. That decision said the contracting
officer did not adequately weigh the value of fee discounts Humana has
negotiated with health care providers in judging future costs relative
to competitors. GAO said TMA should reevaluate the proposals and
make a fresh decision.
GAO brought a heavier hammer down on the Aetna contract. Though
it doesn’t allege that procurement integrity law was broken, GAO
said contracting agencies like TMA have an obligation “to avoid
even the appearance of impropriety” in government
procurement. This time it failed.
If TMA’s own investigation confirms the alleged unfair
competitive advantage, Aetna could be excluded from the competition,
“thereby leaving Health Net as the only viable awardee,” GAO
said.
TRICARE support contractors build and manage huge civilian healthcare
provider networks for military beneficiaries who don’t have access
to on-base health care. The companies handle TRICARE enrollments,
process claims, provide customer service and coordinate specialty
care.
Health Net is the current TRICARE contractor for the 22-state North
Region, serving three million military healthcare beneficiaries.
It filed its protest in August, a month after the announced award went
to Aetna.
Appearance of impropriety was just one of six reasons GAO cited for
upholding the Health Net protest. Other errors were committed by
TRICARE and its unnamed contracting officer, which included failure to
“reasonably evaluate” Aetna’s past performance
information and to “perform a reasonable price/cost realism
assessment” of Aetna’s significantly lower bid.
Steven Tough, president of Health Net, said the alleged conflict of
interest is perhaps the most significant reason for TMA to decide in the
next 60 days whether to overturn the award to Aetna. But the
“realism” of Aetna’s bid also is seen as questionable,
he said. Aetna assumes, for example, it can hire most Health Net
employees at lower salaries, he said.
GAO had bracing criticism for the contracting officer. Even
though the “record demonstrates” that the former chief of
staff at TMA had access to Health Net “proprietary
information,” no “consideration of the issue” was
shown by the contracting officer. Yet the “agency’s
obligation” is to avoid “even the appearance of impropriety
in government procurement,” GAO said.
The decision doesn’t name the former TMA chief of staff.
TRICARE sources said it is retired Air Force Col. Charles
“Chuck” Wolak, now Aetna’s chief of field
operations. GAO said the officer was chief of staff at TMA from
early 2005 until March 2007 when he became “source selection
authority” or top contracting officer for the TRICARE-for-Life
claims processing contract.
A draft request for proposals for next generation support contacts
was released in June that year. A final request went out in
March 2008. The former chief of staff began work for Aetna on Nov.
19, 2007, and “the very next day,” GAO said, “he began
working on ‘certain projects’ related to”
Aetna’s bid on the TRICARE contract.
Aetna told GAO that the new employee worked principally on portions
of their bid dealing with beneficiary satisfaction and customer
service. He was not involved in proposal pricing. But GAO
said Aetna had no “firewall” in place to limit such
participation, and Aetna’s policy of destroying documents in
connection with preparing bid proposals prevented further
confirmation.
Some of Wolak’s e-mails at Aetna suggested a broader
involvement than the company had indicated, GAO suggested. It also
found that while this officer was TMA chief of staff in 2006, he
attended at least four high-level meetings where future TRICARE support
contracts were discussed. The briefing and position papers given
participants identified problems and weaknesses in current contracts,
different approaches for resolving those concerns and pros and cons of
each.
A position paper from one such meeting was “procurement
sensitive” and contained non-public price and cost information
about the operation of TRICARE support contracts by all of incumbent
contractors including total support contract price.
“The record also demonstrates that the former TMA official
continued to have access to his TMA e-mail account, and in fact accessed
that account on at least three occasions after he began working for
[Aetna],” GAO said.
“What do you think would have happened had we not
protested,” asked Tough, noting that a “significant”
conflict issue has come to light.
Wolak could not be reached for comment by this
column’s deadline.
Aetna released a statement saying it can’t know
what action the Department of Defense may take in response to the GAO
decision. But the company “believes it made a very strong
proposal for the TRICARE contract and…feels confident that Aetna
acted appropriately at all times.”
To comment, e-mail milupdate@aol.com, write to
P.O. Box 231111, Centreville, VA, 20120-1111 or visit: www.militaryupdate.com
| Tom Philpott, Military Update, errors, ethics, issue, surface, Aetna, Tricare, contract, FRA |
|