Working retirees win access to Tricare supplement
option
By Tom Philpott
Civilian employers of military retirees
once again can offer a TRICARE supplemental plan with their
cafeteria-style health insurance options so that workers who elect to
use their TRICARE Standard benefit can buy coverage conveniently and
with pre-taxed dollars.
The change took effect June 18 under a
final rule published by the Department of Defense that implements a 2007
law prohibiting employers from enticing retirees to use TRICARE instead
of employer-paid insurance.
The final rule relaxes an interim
regulation unveiled two years. Employers still are prohibited under
section 707 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act
(Public Law 109-364) from offering incentives to military retirees to
leave employer-paid plans and use TRICARE instead.
For example, they can’t
subsidize a TRICARE supplement. They also are barred from offering cash
incentives exclusively to military retirees if these workers will elect
to opt out of employer-paid health plans.
But advocates for working-age military
retirees, backed by Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Ben Nelson
(D-Neb.), had complained that the interim rule published in March 2008
created unnecessary hassles for military retirees in second careers and
denied them of a valuable tax break.
Defense officials agreed.
Under the final rule, which employers
can find in the April 9 Federal Register, DoD exercises an exception
allow under the law. Employers once again can make available in their
cafeteria-style health plans a TRICARE insurance supplement as long as
retiree participants cover the full cost.
Jeff Halseth with Government
Contractors Insurance Services (GCIS), an insurance brokerage that sells
benefit plans to government contractors, said the revised rule will help
working-age military retirees.
"The important thing now is to inform retirees that they
can get a TRICARE supplement through their employer
again,"said Halseth.
Retirees will want to do that, rather
than buy a supplement directly from a broker, Halseth explained, because
premiums paid for cafeteria health plans are exempt from federal and
state taxes including social security tax. This lowers out-of-pocket
costs of a TRICARE supplement by about 27 percent, he said.
Congress acted three years ago to
prohibit employers from offering incentives to TRICARE-eligible
employees to try to turn around a costly trend. More and more companies,
as well as state and local governments, were finding ways to encourage
their military retirees to use TRICARE rather than employer-paid health
plans. In effect, they were shifting their own health care costs onto
federal taxpayers, Defense officials complained.
On reviewing comments received on the
interim rule, Defense officials agreed it was only reasonable to permit
employers to offer TRICARE supplements if the plans are not paid for,
even partially, by employers.
"The employer’s only
involvement is providing the administrative support for the benefits
under the cafeteria plan,"said officials in
an analysis that accompanied the final regulation. Convenience can be
restored to buying supplemental coverage and premiums can qualify for
the tax break.
Officials, meanwhile, have lowered
their estimate of cost savings to TRICARE from cracking down on
employer-paid incentives. The Congressional Budget Office estimated $119
million in savings per year on the belief that 50,000 retirees and
dependents would stop using TRICARE. The revised estimate is only $64
million.
Halseth suggested the trend will
continue. Even if TRICARE were to double annual fees and co-pays paid by
military retirees, he said, the number of working retirees relying on
TRICARE will continue to rise using TRICARE is so much less expensive
than most employer-paid plans.
"The price of employer plans started sky-rocketing in the
late 1990s. It literally doubled between 1999 and 2008,"Halseth
said. "The cost of employer plans started getting so high for
workers that there was a flood of military retirees leaving civilian
plans."
The first priority for workers shifted
from what benefits were covered to what was affordable, and nothing
looked more affordable than their TRICARE. And with each passing year,
as TRICARE fees, co-payments and deductibles have remained frozen at
levels set in 1995, more working retirees have come to rely on health
coverage earned while in service.
Several retirees working in the
civilian sector, in commenting on the interim rule for employer-paid
plans, complained that their employers misunderstood the law. Some
employers, for example, thought they had to exclude TRICARE-eligible
employees from accepting the company’s cash
incentive for any employee who opts out of the employer-paid
plan.
"We hope this final rule will eliminate these
misunderstandings,"officials said.
Some retirees said they are upset that
Congress acted to lessen the value of the TRICARE benefit by banning
employer-paid incentives. The cash incentives had the effect of
eliminating all their out of pocket health costs.
These arrangements did save money both
for retirees and their employers but "by shifting costs
to the former employer, the United States Government and the federal
taxpayers,"Defense officials responded.
Despite what some retirees still
believe, they added, "under the law, there is no entitlement to free,
comprehensive care."
To comment, send e-mail to
milupdate@aol.com or write to Military Update, P.O. Box 231111,
Centreville, VA, 20120-1111
| Tom Philpott, working, retirees, win, access, Tricare, supplement, option, FRA |
|